Trump To Congress: Figure Out Healthcare, or Lose Your Subsidies

Trump To Congress: Figure Out Healthcare, or Lose Your Subsidies”

CORNISH: For people listening who do have insurance coverage through an Affordable Care Act or Obamacare exchange, should they expect any changes to their health care or insurance just in the coming months? Like what you're reading?

Centene has famously (well, famously within health policy circles!) expanded into the marketplace as other bigger health plans like Anthem and United have fled.

I'd say generally the picture nationally is - we are seeing possibly some significant premium increases in 2018 because insurance companies are not sure about those cost-sharing reduction subsidies. Read my full story here. They help insurers cover the cost of offering less expensive insurance plans for low-income customers.

That ambiguity continues today. This was just a few weeks after the Trump administration came into office. As of 2013, though, a seldom-discussed amendment to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), proposed by Republican Sen.

That's because insurance companies will charge more in premiums to make up for the lost payments.

They are insulated from rate increases under the law's provision that says they pay no more than 10 percent of their income on premiums. And insurance companies are still pulling out of the exchanges. No longer making it so that they've got coverage and no care.

Republican legislators have become more vocal in advocating for CSR payments. On Congress members, he asked, "why should Congress not be paying what public pays?" The payments are slated to cost the government $7 billion this fiscal year and $10 billion in 2018, and withdrawing that support could have a ripple effect through the health care economy. "It should include funding for the cost-sharing reductions, but it also should include greater flexibility for states in approving health insurance policies".

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said in an interview with Reuters that he thinks Congress will do just that. Trump is now using them as a bargaining chip to get the Senate to return to its Obamacare repeal effort.

The committee is led by Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat, and Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker, a Republican. The White House re-issued an earlier statement saying, "the president is working with his staff and his Cabinet to consider the issues raised by the ... payments". On Wednesday, Anthem, the second-largest insurer in the United States, said it might leave more markets in 2018.

More than 12 million lower-income people who make no more than four times the national poverty rate - or about $80,000 for a family of three - now receive federal subsidies to help pay for their insurance.

If Trump cuts off the payments and Congress does nothing, Alexander warned, insurers will drastically hike premiums and leave certain parts of the country altogether.

The experts we talked to agreed that characterizing this as a bailout is misleading. Trump inherited the payment structure, but he also has the power to end it.

While premiums have increased considerably over the a year ago, what the Trump administration does next could have a large impact on pricing trends going forward.

So if Trump does move to stop the payments, would the states be able to seek an injunction as part of the pending lawsuit, or would they have to file a separate action?

Molina exits the Wisconsin marketplace, leaving one county bare. The insurer, one of the largest on the exchanges, has 1.5 million enrollees in Obamacare plans.

Molina is a health plan that has been through a bit of turmoil lately. All of the other states joining in the motion to intervene, except Iowa and Kentucky, are governed by Democrats.

President Donald Trump hasn't had much luck in repealing or replacing Obamacare.

President Donald Trump is considering stripping the employer contribution for health insurance away from members of Congress. "They believe they're above the law", he said.

"Some Dems Now Running on Single Payer Healthcare". And according to Levitt's calculations, that would end up costing the government about $2.3 billion more than if they had paid the insurers at the outset. Join our Facebook community for conversation and updates.

Like this